…With an Unlimited Supply…..

by fuster Posted on August 29, 2010

These instructions for cooking a turkey were going to be submitted to the New York Examiner which recently ran a little food gem entitled

Locusts: Who’s eating what?

It is said that locusts were a major part of John the Baptist’s diet. Whether that means grasshoppers or carob is still being debated.

Could be that the regular guy was off being hypertensive that day.

But here’s yet another guy with yet another unlimited supply….

About fuster

fuster cluck is a caring nurturer, a psychic nutritionist and a member of several 12-step programs (as well as the president), but not a licensed pharmacist

View all posts by fuster →

This entry was posted in Culture & Entertainment, Science and tagged Healthcare, Media, Stupid Nonsense, Turkey. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

...Wall...

All

Latest on Tue, 08:55 pm
miguel cervantes: Yes, it's what the Navy guy tells his brother.
miguel cervantes: Harry Harrison wouldn't be considered new wave, I really liked his stainless steel rat, I guess Norman Spinrad would. 'Bug Jack Barron' being a particularly prescient offering,
miguel cervantes: Re; into Darkness' it seems to be a mash up of 'Khan' which is the best of the Trek films, with the unneccesary Iraq analogy, Starfleet trying to go into Khronos, the Klingon homeworld.
CK MacLeod: Did you see it or are you just going on reviews? As for BJ Barron I never got to it, but it seems to have some of the main concerns of New Wave and post-New Wave SF that game and visual-narrative media never get to or maybe can never get to.
miguel cervantes: I did an composite analysis of the reviews, I actually read Bug Jack Barron, many moons ago,
miguel cervantes: Peter Weller's Admiral Marcus, is really Enterprise's 'Colonel Green' in another uniform, and he's supposed to evoke another belligerent policy maker with a Navy background,

Log in to post a comment
(or go to Wall Archive).

Name

Email

Comment
Recent Comments
- Notes on A Living Originalism (4)
  - CK MacLeod:
    What makes you think there is or can be final “limitations” on the system other than as arrived at concretely or politically, through its operation? In practice, given the...
  - CK MacLeod:
    Not sure how much more clearly I can state or re-state the aims of the discussion than in, e.g., Likko’s summary, or immediately afterward, or in the first section, or,...
- How dare you call Hayek profound? (3)
  - CK MacLeod:
    Good stuff.
  - miguel cervantes:
    About one of your favorite authorities http://www.nationalobserver.ne t/2003_spring_109.htm
- Libertarianism as Core-Extreme Ideology of the Liberal Democratic State (7)
  - miguel cervantes:
    Libertarianism entails a minimal state, mostly those spelled out in the constitution, ‘negative liberties’ anarchism is about total demolition, which has almost...
  - CK MacLeod:
    Thanks, bob. There’s more to explore here, including I think especially the differences between libertarianism and anarchism, whose impulses and expressions often overlap....
- “the false notion of heroic self-made aristocracy” (3)
  - CK MacLeod:
    Could be, though it ain’t wut I writed.
  - miguel cervantes:
    You’re right of course, we should all admit we are nothing without the sovereign, frankly that Magna Carta thing was a step too far.
Last Five
Notes on A Living Originalism
The purpose of this unusually long post is to review and expand upon a discussion under a set of posts by Tim Kowal and Burt Likko, who are practicing attorneys with interest in Constitutional Law, on doctrines of Constitutional interpretation. The eventual objective would be a framework for a "synthetic originalism" or "vital originalism" or "living originalism," or an Earnestly Amateurish Unified Theory of American Constitutional Governance.→
How dare you call Hayek profound?
Though Robin sometimes seems to intend to incriminate Hayek and others by association, as with the likes of Pinochet, perhaps as a way to emphasize his continued membership in good standing on the political Left, there is nothing in the core of his argument, as opposed to its trivial polemical decorations, that a Hayekian ought to find embarrassing. To the contrary, Robin attributes "profundity and daring" to Hayek and his marginal siblings. Thought through, Robin's arguments may present at least as many difficulties to a leftist, including one operating from Robin's own presumptions, as to a conservative or to a libertarian.→
trolling Libertariana
I blame the sudden heat wave...→
Libertarianism as Core-Extreme Ideology of the Liberal Democratic State
Libertarianism is infant liberal-democracy, the arrested development of the polity fixated at the level of the pre-socialized or socialization-resistant individual - the pre-dialogical, self-sufficient, natural "I-atheist."→
"the false notion of heroic self-made aristocracy"
betwixt a false reason and none at all→