CK MacLeod's

by fuster Posted on October 17, 2011

No-Name Offense

Watching the Jets play with the Miaminaughts and thought I saw a joke jersey on the Miami center. Am I simply not in on the joke?

and why doesn’t the guy have an unlisted number?

(oh yeah, BTW, Hank Williams Jr is almost as smart as )

About fuster

fuster cluck is a caring nurturer, a psychic nutritionist and a member of several 12-step programs (as well as the president), but not a licensed pharmacist

View all posts by fuster →

This entry was posted in Asides, Sports and tagged and why doesn't the guy have an unlisted number, Why don't the refs call "holding " on the center ?. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to

CK MacLeod says:

October 17, 2011 at 8:55 pm CK MacLeod(Quote)

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/player/richie-incognito/300011 listed as a guard.

Couldn’t bring myself to watch the game. You lookin forward to this Series? I haven’t yet noticed a whole lotta enthusiasm from you baseball mavens for the match-up, either as it was developing or now that it’s set.

Reply
fuster says:

October 17, 2011 at 9:07 pm fuster(Quote)

the best answer to your question is that I posted something about two very mediocre football teams, one of which I dislike.

I watched some of the St Louis-Brewers games and found the starting pitching to be half-past lousy. The last one was unbearably bad.

If Texas manages to lose to St Louis, the Rangers players should be sent to play the Most Dangerous Game with Dick Cheney.

Reply
miguel cervantes says:

October 18, 2011 at 4:48 am miguel cervantes(Quote)

Let me in on the joke, although the joke might be on him:

http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2010-03-15/sports/fl-dolphins-incognito-visit-0315-20100314_1_richie-incognito-nfl-miami-dolphins

Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Twitterei

Tweets by @CK_MacLeod
...Wall...

All

Latest on Wed, 07:42 pm
miguel cervantes: Interesting, however that doesn't explain the full spectrum nature of PRISM, or any of the other programs,
miguel cervantes: http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/artemisia.shtml
miguel cervantes: Well following Greenwald down the rabbit hole, always seemed a dodgy exercise, Le Carre's at the end of the Singularity,
CK MacLeod: Tried to like the latest Die Hard. Wasn't all that easy. It sorta passed the time, but the scenario was so contrived it required clumsy exposition that still didn't really explain things. Will be easily one of the best films of the year though for those whose main cinematic interest is trucks and helicopters crashing and exploding. Also very sentimentally into "dad" issues so a good Father's Day movie even beyond the normal "guy movie" aspect.
miguel cervantes: They threw in a mcGuffin like they did in Die Hard with the Army major, who was Colonel Stuart, (the Oliver North manque) which sort of subverted the point of the story.
miguel cervantes: Interesting backgrounder, seems to be a riff on Neuromancer in some respects; http://journal.remembermegame.com/en/

Log in to post a comment
(or go to Wall Archive).

Name

Email

Comment
Recent Comments
- Government by Other Means (4)
  - Robert Greer:
    No, thank you for this great blog! It’s such a great forum for thinking out loud. I think of anarchism as almost a kind of religious practice: Perhaps it’s too ethereal...
  - CK MacLeod:
    Thanks, Robert – very thoughtful and articulate comment. First, I’d say that elements of the critique ought to apply to anarchism and left-libertarianism, but some might...
- Re-Statement on the World State of States, in Seven Theses, in Relation to International Relations Realism (4)
  - miguel cervantes:
    There is a touch of irony, in this whole Syrian matter, the Alawites, used the Brotherhood networks to target coalition forces in Iraq, but much like the flow of a river, years...
  - CK MacLeod:
    The “classical” realist or Realist (not sure whether to use caps here) approach that Millman was discussing wouldn’t tell us ahead of time whether a power vacuum in...
- Syria and the Neo-Imperial Interest (5)
  - miguel cervantes:
    Yes, I read the piece, the key is Qatar’s running the operation, and their preference for Al Nusra, as with Bel Hadj and Bin Qumu, in the last outing, is the key.
  - CK MacLeod:
    Mr. I seems to me to remain left-oriented but politically bi-curious. So he observes Marshall’s blanket anti-interventionism and reflexive “anti-imperialismR...
- No wonder is thogh that he were astoned (2)
  - miguel cervantes:
    I don’t think it’s possible to misunderstand political philosophy ot economy to a greater extent, now he might be closer with mercantilism, or a rentier class, but...
- not discussing a conservative understanding of the sexual division of labor (5)
  - CK MacLeod:
    Thanks, Robert, very well said, and good to see you around again. I’m hesitant to say anything at all, since I’m afraid of falling into that multi-thread 1,000+ comment...
Last Five
What We Find Interesting: Reply to Noah Millman on Obsolete IR Realism
If any serious attempt to define the American national interest leads us to an overdetermining or geographically, political-economically, and ideologically mutually conditioning internationalism or transnational impetus, borne out in the great events and ideas and seemingly inexorable material processes of the last two centuries, resulting in the state of the world as we know it, then nation-state Realism in relationship to America turns itself inside out or upside down.→
Re-Statement on the World State of States, in Seven Theses, in Relation to International Relations Realism
The United State of America, by process of geographical and historical election, and by related ideological pre-disposition, plays a unique role in the administration of the global state interest, a role seemingly little understood by many whose occupations and pre-occupations are explaining, arguing about, and, in some places, denying it.→
Government by Other Means
In the libertarian imagination or, as Professor Hanley prefers, the libertarian psyche, the reduction in the power of government (or "government") means an increase in power for each libertarian or for the individual, which latter, as individuality, is presented as an ideal, but which each individual knows exclusively and therefore universally only through and as him- or herself. The libertarians do not recognize popularly sovereign liberal-democratic government as an extension of themselves, or, put more precisely, of this self. They may exploit or even admire democratic impulses and particular constitutional traditions, but their views are in this sense profoundly anti-democratic and constitutionally anti-constitutional.→
Syria and the Neo-Imperial Interest
What may be "unreasonable" is any belief that in the final analysis hard and fast distinctions along Isquith's lines – between a human rights regime and a neo-imperial regime – can ever remain very hard or fast, or sustainable at all. Put differently, "Responsibility to Protect" may be inherently and objectively imperialistic or neo-imperialistic, may pre-suppose a global state and global guardian of its interests, but saying so may confirm that the neo-imperial interest, which most of us may embrace more or less unconsciously, includes values, goals, and norms that we consider universal and as a matter of irrevocable and foundational commitment.→
No wonder is thogh that he were astoned
Precisely because you are deafened, however, you cannot hear anyone explaining the fact to you, or trying to direct you to shelter: Philosophy says to you, "You can't hear me - let's go somewhere quiet," but you of course cannot make out the words, nor will you read its lips (perhaps you are also blinded by the lightning flashes).→