the other way of coping with Grass’s demons

by CK MacLeod Posted on April 10, 2012

Ran across the above at this isn’t happiness.

This entry was posted in Asides and tagged Guenter Grass, nuclear weapons. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to the other way of coping with Grass’s demons

fuster says:

April 15, 2012 at 1:50 pm fuster(Quote)

well it looks like that kid in the cartoon is being helped to go out happy.

Reply
- CK MacLeod says:
  
  April 15, 2012 at 2:36 pm CK MacLeod(Quote)
  
  noticed that, too, but he doesn’t look very happy to me.
  
  Reply
fuster says:

April 15, 2012 at 3:02 pm fuster(Quote)

my first was from a fourteen year old wearing braces, and I was scared of the hardware…. prolly didn’t appear much amused either.

Reply
miguel cervantes says:

April 20, 2012 at 10:02 am miguel cervantes(Quote)

Interesting picked up this old, Erdman potboiler from 1976, set in 1979, the Crash of 1979, which involves an American banker’s attempt to prevent a conflict between Saudi Arabia, and the Shah of Iran, involving the then nascent nuclear weapons
program, they mention facilities at Isfahan, and Abadan, as well as Natanz, So there’s nothing new under the sun,

Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Twitterei

Tweets by @CK_MacLeod
...Wall...

All

Latest on Wed, 07:42 pm
miguel cervantes: Interesting, however that doesn't explain the full spectrum nature of PRISM, or any of the other programs,
miguel cervantes: http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/artemisia.shtml
miguel cervantes: Well following Greenwald down the rabbit hole, always seemed a dodgy exercise, Le Carre's at the end of the Singularity,
CK MacLeod: Tried to like the latest Die Hard. Wasn't all that easy. It sorta passed the time, but the scenario was so contrived it required clumsy exposition that still didn't really explain things. Will be easily one of the best films of the year though for those whose main cinematic interest is trucks and helicopters crashing and exploding. Also very sentimentally into "dad" issues so a good Father's Day movie even beyond the normal "guy movie" aspect.
miguel cervantes: They threw in a mcGuffin like they did in Die Hard with the Army major, who was Colonel Stuart, (the Oliver North manque) which sort of subverted the point of the story.
miguel cervantes: Interesting backgrounder, seems to be a riff on Neuromancer in some respects; http://journal.remembermegame.com/en/

Log in to post a comment
(or go to Wall Archive).

Name

Email

Comment
Recent Comments
- Government by Other Means (4)
  - Robert Greer:
    No, thank you for this great blog! It’s such a great forum for thinking out loud. I think of anarchism as almost a kind of religious practice: Perhaps it’s too ethereal...
  - CK MacLeod:
    Thanks, Robert – very thoughtful and articulate comment. First, I’d say that elements of the critique ought to apply to anarchism and left-libertarianism, but some might...
- Re-Statement on the World State of States, in Seven Theses, in Relation to International Relations Realism (4)
  - miguel cervantes:
    There is a touch of irony, in this whole Syrian matter, the Alawites, used the Brotherhood networks to target coalition forces in Iraq, but much like the flow of a river, years...
  - CK MacLeod:
    The “classical” realist or Realist (not sure whether to use caps here) approach that Millman was discussing wouldn’t tell us ahead of time whether a power vacuum in...
- Syria and the Neo-Imperial Interest (5)
  - miguel cervantes:
    Yes, I read the piece, the key is Qatar’s running the operation, and their preference for Al Nusra, as with Bel Hadj and Bin Qumu, in the last outing, is the key.
  - CK MacLeod:
    Mr. I seems to me to remain left-oriented but politically bi-curious. So he observes Marshall’s blanket anti-interventionism and reflexive “anti-imperialismR...
- No wonder is thogh that he were astoned (2)
  - miguel cervantes:
    I don’t think it’s possible to misunderstand political philosophy ot economy to a greater extent, now he might be closer with mercantilism, or a rentier class, but...
- not discussing a conservative understanding of the sexual division of labor (5)
  - CK MacLeod:
    Thanks, Robert, very well said, and good to see you around again. I’m hesitant to say anything at all, since I’m afraid of falling into that multi-thread 1,000+ comment...
Last Five
What We Find Interesting: Reply to Noah Millman on Obsolete IR Realism
If any serious attempt to define the American national interest leads us to an overdetermining or geographically, political-economically, and ideologically mutually conditioning internationalism or transnational impetus, borne out in the great events and ideas and seemingly inexorable material processes of the last two centuries, resulting in the state of the world as we know it, then nation-state Realism in relationship to America turns itself inside out or upside down.→
Re-Statement on the World State of States, in Seven Theses, in Relation to International Relations Realism
The United State of America, by process of geographical and historical election, and by related ideological pre-disposition, plays a unique role in the administration of the global state interest, a role seemingly little understood by many whose occupations and pre-occupations are explaining, arguing about, and, in some places, denying it.→
Government by Other Means
In the libertarian imagination or, as Professor Hanley prefers, the libertarian psyche, the reduction in the power of government (or "government") means an increase in power for each libertarian or for the individual, which latter, as individuality, is presented as an ideal, but which each individual knows exclusively and therefore universally only through and as him- or herself. The libertarians do not recognize popularly sovereign liberal-democratic government as an extension of themselves, or, put more precisely, of this self. They may exploit or even admire democratic impulses and particular constitutional traditions, but their views are in this sense profoundly anti-democratic and constitutionally anti-constitutional.→
Syria and the Neo-Imperial Interest
What may be "unreasonable" is any belief that in the final analysis hard and fast distinctions along Isquith's lines – between a human rights regime and a neo-imperial regime – can ever remain very hard or fast, or sustainable at all. Put differently, "Responsibility to Protect" may be inherently and objectively imperialistic or neo-imperialistic, may pre-suppose a global state and global guardian of its interests, but saying so may confirm that the neo-imperial interest, which most of us may embrace more or less unconsciously, includes values, goals, and norms that we consider universal and as a matter of irrevocable and foundational commitment.→
No wonder is thogh that he were astoned
Precisely because you are deafened, however, you cannot hear anyone explaining the fact to you, or trying to direct you to shelter: Philosophy says to you, "You can't hear me - let's go somewhere quiet," but you of course cannot make out the words, nor will you read its lips (perhaps you are also blinded by the lightning flashes).→