High Noon for the Mitt Contract

I don’t normally take InTrade very seriously, but as a former daytrader and not just as a longtime confirmed non-fan of the Mittster, I find this kind of price move in a contract something to behold.

Closing Prices chart as of High Noon PST – Mitt Romney to be elected President in 2012:

There’s usually a tradable bounce, sometimes a breathtaking recovery move, in a heavily traded stock undergoing this kind of collapse. That was one of the few trade set-ups, and one of the most exciting to act on, that I ever got any good at – but I’m not convinced at all that InTrade is the kind of market where that sort of thing is doable.

This entry was posted in Asides, Politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.   

9 Responses to High Noon for the Mitt Contract

  1. avatar fuster says:

    I don’t understand. what does the chart say that people are trying to trade Romney for?

  2. avatar fuster says:

    is it the bag that’s half-eaten or is it a full bag of half-eaten peanuts?

    expiring minds want to know

    • avatar CK MacLeod says:

      actually it’s a bag one-quarter full of extra-large peanuts, strangely enough. Comes out to about half. Plus a few styrofoam to fill it out some.

      Contract still falling today, but not as steep as y-day, still way outside the 20-day standard deviation…

  3. avatar fuster says:

    should value continue to fall, will bags of pre-eaten peanuts come into play?

    • avatar CK MacLeod says:

      yes, and then pre-eaten and pre-digested bag fragments, both paper and cellophane. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves yet.

      • avatar fuster says:

        I’m not, you’re traders arre. Romney as the Repub candidate has a floor that he’s close to and through which he is not going to fall unless conjoined with a dead boy or live Islamist girl.

        • avatar CK MacLeod says:

          true, but the Mitt contract pays 0 whether Mitt get 268 electoral votes or 0 electoral votes. Now, if I were a trader, and Intrade a sufficiently liquid market, I’d be a buyer on the first sign of a bounce in whatever relevant time frame precisely because sometime over the next few weeks he’ll probably get some kind of good news or an outlier poll or something. But it’s a binary decision in the end, and I’ve always thought he was going to lose, so, barring Obama w/dead boy etc., I’d unload the contract as soon as I’d made any profit on it at all.

  4. avatar CK MacLeod says:

    For ref here’s today’s Obama chart:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting