CK MacLeod has big major league out of the ballpark itsy bitsy micro-problems that not even he cares about, and it's a big problem to hardly anyone especially him. "A physics lesson not a person, sub-microscopic me with lightyears-across problems.
Problematicheski,
parsecwide,
problems.
Problarama.
Sentenced to life,
for my own murder,
a penalty too harsh
for so too trivial an infraction."
the post-CU world is a world in which the 0.0001% are financing a remarkably effective satire undermining themselves and their chosen spokespeople: Diminishing returns as morality play. Continue reading →
The real nightmare is already ongoing, and everyone in the family knows it: of a party splintering, each main ideological element of the Reagan Era coalition exposed both as insufficient on its own terms and as unable to discover a compelling rationale for uniting with its customary allies. Continue reading →
The economic liberal whose personality is another “private equity” is the human exponent of the universal equivalent, money, and approximates its mode of operation in his chameleonlike adaptability. Yesterday he was a social liberal, today he’s a social conservative. He doesn’t “really” care. He isn’t “really” anyone, at least as far as we’re concerned. And that’s who he is for political purposes – same as what he comes across as – no one in particular. Continue reading →
It’s just a movie poster, for a movie I don’t recall anyone ever having had much to say about, but the image always stuck in my mind, and today it seems especially sad and expressive. The concept of the movie … Continue reading →
He combines a good shot with excellent court awareness and ball skills, and his more Nash than Paul style meshes with D’Antoni’s offense. He’s not yet really been tested, but he’s clearly earned the right to a real test beyond whatever inevitable and likely impending drop-off in his performance and in attention. Continue reading →
No one discussing the notion of “Israel First,” as no one once upon a time discussing the mirror notion of “America First,” can fully comprehend the paradox embedded in the concept except materially, except in the actualization of their ignorance – their, your, my, our ignorance – via politics. Continue reading →
miguel cervantes: Bossie’s was clearly a political consideration, as was Fahrenheit 451,
fuster: miggs, in case you missed it, the Court had a bit of trouble deciding where political speech and commercial speech separated. if someone shows a movie to paying audiences and it revolves...
CK MacLeod: https://www.google.com/search? q=miguel+doesn%27t+get+it& ;ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&a q=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB :official&client=firefox- a
CK MacLeod: Yes, it actually happened that he misspoke on national TV, and furthermore it’s generally recognized that in fact he has a tendency to misspeak, but it’s also generally...
fuster: Stayed up for a late replay of the Nix-Sac game and got first look at Lin……..he was, to my eye, an average NBA point guard if he learns to stop waiting a fraction too long to...
the post-CU world is a world in which the 0.0001% are financing a remarkably effective satire undermining themselves and their chosen spokespeople: Diminishing returns as morality play. →
The real nightmare is already ongoing, and everyone in the family knows it: of a party splintering, each main ideological element of the Reagan Era coalition exposed both as insufficient on its own terms and as unable to discover a compelling rationale for uniting with its customary allies. →
The economic liberal whose personality is another “private equity” is the human exponent of the universal equivalent, money, and approximates its mode of operation in his chameleonlike adaptability. Yesterday he was a social liberal, today he’s a social conservative. He doesn’t “really” care. He isn’t “really” anyone, at least as far as we’re concerned. And that’s who he is for political purposes - same as what he comes across as – no one in particular. →
Recently Read or Reviewed or Currently Reading or Just Like Looking At It
The Tsar, Who Is Above the Law, Declares Nothing To Be Above the Law
In short:
"It is almost as if, starting from a certain point, every decisive political event were double-sided: the spaces, the liberties, and the rights won by individuals in their conflicts with central powers always simultaneously prepared a tacit but increasing inscription of individuals' lives within the state order, thus offering a new and more dreadful foundation for the very sovereign power from which they wanted to liberate themselves."
not necessarily great like good great
In short:
"Our thesis is that the idea of a self-adjusting market implied a stark utopia. Such an institution could not exist for any length of time without annihilating the human and natural substance of society; it would have physically destroyed man and transformed his surroundings into a wilderness. Inevitably, society took measures to protect itself..."
among others
In short:
"Inner things or outer things, what are they but things and things!"
What a Concept
In short:
The perceived intellectual exhaustion of liberalism, along with receding memories of the 1930s, has in recent years led to renewed interest in Carl Schmitt's work, including this tract, written at the time that Schmitt was urging Hindenburg to save the Weimar Republic from itself. Hindenburg had other ideas. The author was a German who joined the Nazi Party in the same month as Martin Heidegger, and was active in subequent years as an ideological anti-semite, but THE CONCEPT OF THE POLITICAL remains arguably one of the most important and challenging pieces of political writing of the last 100 years.
Enigma wrapped in the obvious
In short:
"A synoptic view of the current crisis would say: while the epicentre lies in the technologies and organisational forms of the credit system and the state-finance nexus, the underlying problem is excessive capitalist empowerment vis-a-vis labour and consequent wage repression, leading to problems of effective demand papered over by credit-fuelled consumerism of excess in one part of the world and a too rapid expansion of production in new product lines in another."
Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful
In short:
Throughout the book, which mainly consists of political-historical essays written over the last fifteen years, Robin describes reactionary conservatism as a movement that cannot live without an enemy, and that, as seen many times in its history going back to Edmund Burke and up to the present day, is therefore endangered by its own success. More at The Ages of Reagans.
Eghel Lehge Gheel Ghele Leegh
In short:
Fredric Jameson re-reads Hegel's most perplexing work - intended to be a dispensable preface, but translated since Hegel's time into a core statement - for the (for whatever) present moment. He therefore begins at the end: "Absolute Spirit cannot be considered as a terminus of any kind, without transforming Phenomenology of Spirit into a developmental narrative, one that can be characterized variously as teleological or cyclical, but which in either case is to be vigorously repudiated by modern, or at least by contemporary, thought of whatever persuasion."