Comments for CK MacLeod's

Comment on Fools, Their Money, and Citizens More and More United by miguel cervantes

miguel cervantes — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:36:41 +0000

Bossie’s was clearly a political consideration, as was Fahrenheit 451,

Comment on Fools, Their Money, and Citizens More and More United by fuster

fuster — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:37:42 +0000

miggs, in case you missed it, the Court had a bit of trouble deciding where political speech and commercial speech separated.

if someone shows a movie to paying audiences and it revolves around political figures, is that political or commercial or artistic?

Comment on Fools, Their Money, and Citizens More and More United by miguel cervantes

miguel cervantes — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:05:22 +0000

Well it’s about political speech, not anything as quotidian as commercial claims, now one could make an argument this is as open ended as US v, Sullivan,

Comment on Wall Archive by miguel cervantes

miguel cervantes — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:27:41 +0000

Don Draper, (actually not his real name) is the smooth talking
Organization Man of Mad Men,

Comment on Fools, Their Money, and Citizens More and More United by CK MacLeod

CK MacLeod — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:42:50 +0000

See, now that’s what I was looking for, an interesting and thoughtful distinction, but the articlegoes back to my oh so very very subtle point: What makes the decision the decision we so know and love is it’s breadth. It didn’t go all the way – “what the hey, let’s protect ALL speech, fire in a crowded building, obscenity, fraud, you name it” – but it wasn’t as modest as the author of that article seemed to have been expecting either.

Comment on Wall Archive by fuster

fuster — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:27:11 +0000

miggs, beloved of Allah, have you hugged a mohel today?

Who’s this Donnie the draper?

Comment on Fools, Their Money, and Citizens More and More United by fuster

fuster — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:23:26 +0000

don’t be so worried….. you get a great deal of lee-way with me, Colin………and if you get get out of line……..I’ll already be there most likely.

there were a couple of different ways to go……and one of the grumpiest and brightest of the Muddville nine suggested one………

Comment on Fools, Their Money, and Citizens More and More United by CK MacLeod

CK MacLeod — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:43:48 +0000

twarnt beein smartaleky, was hopen a be edumacated

Comment on Fools, Their Money, and Citizens More and More United by CK MacLeod

CK MacLeod — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:43:00 +0000

Yah, I got dat on Brown, but I meant on CU.

Comment on Fools, Their Money, and Citizens More and More United by fuster

fuster — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:34:03 +0000

breadth is deciding Brown v Board of Ed by saying that separate but equal can never be permitted rather than deciding the case narrowly by saying that the Board was not in this instance furnishing an equal education and that the Board must come up with a plan to remedy the inequality.

the case is decided against the Topeka B of E either way, which is the decision, but…….there’s a slight difference in breadth